As power density and device performance continue to climb, thermal management has moved from a supporting issue to a core design constraint. Diamond is drawing so much attention because its ordered cubic lattice allows extremely efficient phonon transport, giving single-crystal diamond thermal conductivity of up to 2200 W/(mK). Since cost and brittleness limit the use of monolithic diamond, composite design has become the more practical route for advanced heat-spreading applications.
01. Polymer-based diamond thermal composites
Polymer composites are lightweight, easy to process, and cost-effective, which is why they are widely used as thermal interface materials between devices and heat sinks. Their thermal performance depends heavily on the filler. Diamond is especially attractive because it combines high thermal conductivity with excellent electrical insulation.
The central challenge is interfacial compatibility. When bonding between diamond and the polymer matrix is poor, interfacial thermal resistance rises and the overall composite cannot reach its potential. Surface treatment is therefore a routine part of composite design.
Three modification routes are used most often:
(1) Silane coupling agents: one end reacts with functional groups on synthetic diamond, while the other bonds with the polymer matrix and improves adhesion.
(2) Surfactants: these molecules improve compatibility between the two phases and strengthen interfacial contact.
(3) Surface functionalization: chemical, photochemical, or ozone-based treatments introduce functional groups that improve affinity with organic polymers.
02. Metal-matrix diamond thermal composites
Diamond/metal systems combine diamond's high thermal conductivity and low thermal expansion with the processability and conductivity of a metal matrix. The most common routes are diamond/copper, diamond/aluminum, and diamond/magnesium.

Diamond/copper is often regarded as the most mature route because copper already performs well as a heat-spreader material. Diamond/aluminum benefits from lower density and is well suited to aerospace-style lightweight thermal management. Diamond/magnesium offers even lower density, but the thermal-expansion mismatch remains a major challenge.
Because heat in diamond is carried mainly by phonons while heat in metals is carried mainly by electrons, interface quality becomes the dominant factor in overall performance. Typical improvement strategies therefore focus on stronger interfacial bonding and well-designed transition layers.
Common engineering routes include matrix alloying, metallization of the diamond surface, and the introduction of functional transition layers such as carbides or nitrides. Together, these approaches reduce interfacial scattering and improve thermal transport in the finished composite.